Nut Up: Hawks 7, Flyers 4

1

Well, you can unclench now.  If you're like me, you spent most of your day anxiously waiting for this game to start.  It wasn't even that I was worried about the outcome, I just wanted to get it started and let the chips fall where they may. 

There has been much talk during this series about "momentum".  The Hawks won two one goal games and had it.  Then the Flyers won an overtime goal and they had it.  Then Philly won again and thus really had the momentum.  They had it all going into tonight.

Well, as my favorite newsmonster Morbo would say: MOMENTUM DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!

Across North America, physicists everywhere are lying in the fetal position, absolutely horrified at the abuse of the term.  They probably haven't had it this bad since Tim McCarver discovered the word "torque".

But I digress.  The Hawks decided early on that defensive zone coverage wasn't going to be their first priority, and were extremely sloppy at times in their own end.  Of course, they offset this by playing seemingly 90% of the game in Philly's end.  The Hawks scored 3 goals to open the game, and while the Flyers got four of their back, the Hawks answered every single goal.  Joel Quenneville's going to get a lot of credit for changing up his lines to try and get Byfuglien and Kane away from Chris Pronger (and I think most of us agreed prior to the game this was a good idea) but I'm not sure that would have mattered tonight.  Every guy on the Hawks was firing on all cylinders, and even when Quenneville had to shuffle the deck a few times, the Hawks didn't lose a beat.  It was great to see, and if they play like this the rest of the series, they will win.

Regardless, let's not suddenly think the Flyers are simply done.  They never gave up on this game, they were simply couldn't stop the Hawks from putting pucks in the net.  Philadelphia has stared down elimination before, and they haven't flinched.  The Hawks don't have any "momentum" going into Game 6 anymore than the Flyers did tonight.  Game 6 is a total restart, a clean slate.  The only thing tonight determined was that the Hawks need to take 1 game to win the Stanley Cup, and the Flyers need to win 2.

Which is far better than the alternative.

THE GOOD

Marian Hossa - It's an odd thing when a team can play so well collectively, and yet a guy who didn't score a goal stood out this much.  Marian Hossa has been the Hawks best forward all series, and he was a beast again tonight.  Hossa played like he was going to win this game or kill everyone else on the ice trying.

Jonathan Toews - Everything I said up there about Marian Hossa?  Just read it again.

Dustin Byfuglien - Manbeast showed up tonight.  Buff hit everything that moved, including Dan O'Hallaran and even freight trained Chris Pronger.  And he finally got on the board with an easy tip in on a beautiful pass from Jonathan Toews on the power play, then closed out the game with an empty netter.

THE BAD

Behind the Net - For whatever reason, the Hawks have a horrible time with covering this area.  Chicago basically overcame that spending most of their time in the Flyers offensive zone.  Maybe the Hawks should go back to the shorter ice surface of the old Stadium?

Defensive Zone Coverage - Once again, a Flyer was left all alone standing next to Antti Niemi, and there were a couple of other terribly blown assignments.  Luckily, the Hawks remedied this by playing most of the game on the other end of the ice.  Still, it'd be nice of them tighten it up a bit, if only for my heart's sake.

THE UGLY

The officiating - referees O'Hallaran and McCreary were terrible again.  Here's a section of the NHL rulebook they might want to bone up on:

RULE 60: A penalty is assessed if a player strikes another player with a high stick

Evidentally, McCreary and O'Hallaran think that tapping a guy in the face with a stick is an acceptable greeting or something.  They missed several, including a obvious one on Brian Campbell as he was moving the puck, and another which nearly resulted in Danny Briere losing an eye (no, it wasn't Hossa).


Up next: Wednesday.  Philadelphia.  See you then.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 6/6/2010 10:42 PM Pat Kane's Mullet wrote:
    Apparently Buff said this after the game

    "Flyers give Dustin Byfuglien gas"
    Reply to this
  • 6/6/2010 10:50 PM CT wrote:
    Not sure if anybody noticed at the end of the game, but Eager made sure he had the puck and took it with him.
    Reply to this
    1. 6/6/2010 11:33 PM illinikc33 wrote:
      Someone on SCH noticed that Eager went to the Philly bench after the game w/ the puck but was stopped by the refs.
      Reply to this
  • 6/6/2010 11:08 PM Keith wrote:
    I was very happy to see that Dustin Byfuglien decided to stop playing like regular season Dustin Byfuglien tonight. We don't need any more of that.
    Reply to this
  • 6/6/2010 11:42 PM Scott wrote:
    Great win tonight. Am I the only one who thought phillies second goal was interference. Hartnell jumped in the crease and impeded
    niemi. It doesn't matter now but I was yelling at the time and Eddie didn't say anything about it. Maybe I'm wrong but I'd like some
    confirmation.
    Reply to this
    1. 6/7/2010 8:40 AM Mike D. wrote:
      Am I the only one who thought phillies second goal was interference. Hartnell jumped in the crease and impeded
      niemi.


      Everyone in the first two rows of Section 326 felt so as well.

      Also, Campbell didn't need to dive after he got hit in the face. Not saying that's why the refs ignored the infraction, just sayin'...
      Reply to this
      1. 6/7/2010 8:03 PM Reuschel's Jowls wrote:
        Everyone at the game-watch party I was at did, too. I can't believe it wasn't at least reviewed. There was way more contact there than, say, the goal they disallowed against the Wings back in March because Buff coughed on Howard...

        Just like Campbell, though, Niemi needed to sell the penalty a little better. He needed to draw attention to the fact that Hartnell was lying on his leg. An angrier response by his teammates might have triggered a replay review as well.

        I'm not up for the Hawks getting into a bitching session with the refs, but I don't think the Hawks should be above a well-placed "what the hell, guys?" when it's warranted. Especially when a goal is in dispute at this time of the year. And especially when Bill Fucking McCreary is involved.
        Reply to this
  • 6/6/2010 11:44 PM vito wrote:
    now thats the hawks team i was waiting for. If they play like that on wednesday and they will win. Thanks to Dave Morris, i'm not negative anymore and i am a proud chicagoan
    Reply to this
    1. 6/6/2010 11:58 PM Dave Morris wrote:
      This was "a man's game" tonight,

      And the men of the Blackhawk tribe were worthy. 

      Believe.

      Stay thirsty, my friends.
      Reply to this
  • 6/7/2010 8:05 AM J.J. from Kansas wrote:
    Congrats on the win. That first period was the Blackhawkiest looking period so far in the finals.

    Still, any idea when the defenses are going to show up? 7-4 is ridiculous.
    Reply to this
  • 6/7/2010 8:06 AM denrizz wrote:
    Let's just finish this thing Wednesday. I would not want to take my chances against this bunch of vampires Friday.
    Reply to this
  • 6/7/2010 8:17 AM vito wrote:
    now thats the hawks team i was waiting for. If they play like that on wednesday and they will win. Thanks to Dave Morris, i'm not negative anymore and i am a proud chicagoan
    Reply to this
    1. 6/7/2010 11:32 AM vito wrote:
      oops! my bad, sorry
      Reply to this
  • 6/7/2010 8:49 AM vito wrote:
    Hockeenight needs to do a puckcast before wednseday. It brings good luck!!
    Reply to this
    1. 6/7/2010 10:40 AM Fork wrote:
      We're doing one tonight. Dave bailed out our moron producer, who forgot to schedule anything, so he'll be wasting time with us. We may have one more person joining us.

      And by "moron producer", I mean me.
      Reply to this
      1. 6/7/2010 3:01 PM vito wrote:
        Don't be so hard on yourself
        Reply to this
        1. 6/7/2010 5:00 PM Fork wrote:
          Self-deprecating humor is part of my charm.
          Reply to this
  • 6/7/2010 9:00 PM JDNoce wrote:
    Hey...who was your guys' first puckcast with?
    Reply to this
  • 6/7/2010 10:44 PM CT wrote:
    Our first Puckcast was me and Fork. Our first guest was some guy who used to have a website or something. I wonder what ever happened to that dude?
    Reply to this
    1. 6/8/2010 4:09 PM Fro Dog wrote:
      When do I get on the Puckcast? Does it require a telephone? Because if it does, I need to go buy one.
      Reply to this
      1. 6/9/2010 5:25 PM Fork wrote:
        Fro, we'll have you & MGRW on together, and we can just take the night off.
        Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.